Use cases
Inventory
Find every tool, owner, seat, and cost.
Savings
Catch waste, overlap, and renewals early.
Access
Onboard and offboard across your stack.
Context
Map how people, tools, spend, and agents connect.
For
Founders
Protect runway by seeing every tool and cost.
Engineering
Control AI usage, access, and provider spend.
Finance
Reconcile software spend and find waste.
Operations
Keep inventory, access, and renewals current.
Resources & company
Resources
Guides and practical software insights.
Manifesto
Why software operations need a new model.
Press
Company news and media resources.
Partners
Build and grow with ELI.
IntegrationsStacksTools
Talk to a humanDiscover my stack
IntegrationsStacksTools
Discover my stackTalk to a human

Company

  • Home
  • Manifesto
  • Talk to us
  • Partners

Help

  • Terms of service
  • Privacy policy
  • Docs

Product

  • Inventory
  • Savings
  • Access
  • Context

For teams

  • Founders
  • Engineering
  • Finance
  • Operations

Explore

  • Integrations
  • Tools
  • Stacks
  • Startup credits
  • Articles

Socials

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • TikTok
  • YouTube
Enterprise Layer Intelligence
Categories/AI Orchestration & MLOps/Coarena
Coarena

Coarena

Compare computer-use AI models through blind human evaluations and live benchmark tasks

Pricing model

Free

Rating

★ People love it

Time to value

Immediate

You can use Coarena to compare and benchmark computer-use autonomous agents against real-world digital tasks. The service lets you submit prompt challenges such as web research or spreadsheet editing, watch two competing models execute steps side by side, and rate outcomes through blind human testing. You can explore public leaderboards scored across task completion, operational speed, error recovery, and compute costs. In addition, you can access safety evaluations, inspect detailed model profiles, review reproducible benchmark rules, and analyze how agents operate desktop applications.

What Coarena does

Submit real-world computer tasks for agent head-to-head battlesVote on agent performance in blind evaluation roundsFilter leaderboards by completion rate, speed, and costReview reproducible methodology rules for model rankingsInspect model profiles and individual evaluation tracesQuery evaluation data through the metrics APISide-by-side agent battles on live tasksBlind human judgment for evaluating outputsLeaderboards tracking completion rates and recoveryCost and latency tracking per taskDedicated CUA KnowledgeBench benchmarksSafety and risk evaluation metricsAPI access to historical model performance metrics

Pricing breakdown

Pricing model: Free

Tutorials & Demos

Frequently asked

Want a tailored answer?

See whether Coarena fits your stack.

Techbible weighs Coarena against what you already pay for, your team shape, and the work that's actually happening. Free to start.

Side by side

Compare Coarena

Search the catalog or pick a similar tool to compare pricing, features, and fit.

Or pick from similar tools

More in AI Orchestration & MLOps

All tools →
CrewAI

CrewAI

Build and run autonomous multi-agent workflows using visual canvases or Python code

Arize AI

Arize AI

Monitor, trace, and evaluate large language model applications

PySpur

PySpur

Build, test, and deploy AI agent workflows using code or visual drag-and-drop interfaces

Twelve Labs

Twelve Labs

Enables developers to build applications that understand video.

AgentOps

AgentOps

Track, debug, and monitor AI agents and large language model interactions

Composio

Composio

Connect AI models and agents to external apps and developer tools

Weights & Biases

Weights & Biases

Helps AI developers track and manage machine learning experiments.

Buster

Buster

Build internal agents and automate complex company workflows

Coarena, computer use agents, AI agent benchmark, LLM leaderboard, model evaluation, blind human judgment, agent speed, task completion rate, CUA KnowledgeBench, model profiles, safety benchmark, metrics API, Coasty, autonomous agents, spreadsheet automation testing, web research evaluation